Education Personality Development Essay

Over the years Ms. Padilla has almost certainly had kindergarteners who lacked some of the basic knowledge and skills on which early academic success depends - color and shape names, the alphabet, counting, and so on. Some of these children have probably come from lower-income, minority-group backgrounds, just as Lupita has. And in Ms. Padilla's experience, children who can answer questions and contribute to class discussions usually speak up or raise their hands, but Lupita is quiet and restrained. With such data in hand, Ms. Padilla initially concludes that Lupita has not mastered the knowledge and skills she will need in first grade. If the researcher’s videotape had not captured Lupita's social skills and proficiency with puzzles, Lupita might very well have remained on the sidelines throughout much of the school year, getting little assistance on academic skills and few opportunities to capitalize on her many positive personal attributes.

Long before they begin school, children begin to show significant differences in personality—that is, they show some consistency in their behavior in a wide variety of situations. For instance, Lupita tends to be quiet and well-behaved, whereas some of her peers are probably noisy and rambunctious. Lupita is also conscientious about completing her work, whereas at least one of her classmates must be reminded to complete his Spanish assignment. And she is socially astute, quickly tuning in to the nuances of others’ behavior and responding appropriately, whereas some of her age-mates may have little awareness of other people’s verbal and nonverbal messages. Lupita’s conscientiousness and social prowess will undoubtedly serve her well in the years to come. Her quiet nature may or may not work in her favor, depending on classroom tasks and demands. In Ms. Padilla’s class it works against her, to the point where she becomes almost invisible and so rarely gets the academic assistance she needs to move forward.

Children’s personalities are the result of both heredity—especially in the form of inherited temperaments—and such environmental factors as parents’ behaviors and cultural expectations. As you will see, heredity and environment often interact in their influences.


In general, a child’s temperament is his or her general tendency to respond to and deal with environmental events in particular ways. Children seem to have distinct temperaments almost from birth. For instance, some (like Lupita) are quiet and subdued, whereas others are more active and energetic. Researchers have identified many temperamental styles that emerge early in life and are relatively enduring, including general activity level, adaptability, persistence, adventurousness, outgoingness, shyness, fearfulness, inhibitedness, irritability, and distractibility. Most psychologists agree that such temperamental differences are biologically based and have genetic origins (Caspi & Silva, 1995; Keogh, 2003; Pfeifer, Goldsmith, Davidson, & Rickman, 2002; Rothbart, Ahadi, & Evans, 2000; A. Thomas & Chess, 1977).

Children’s inherited temperaments influence the learning opportunities they have and so also influence the environmental factors that come into play in shaping their personal and social development (N. A. Fox, Henderson, Rubin, Calkins, & Schmidt, 2001; Keogh, 2003). For example, children who are energetic and adventuresome seek out a wider variety of experiences than those who are quiet and restrained. Children who are naturally vivacious and outgoing have more opportunities to learn social skills and establish rewarding interpersonal relationships.

Many temperamental variables affect how students engage in and respond to classroom activities and thus indirectly affect their academic achievement (Keogh, 2003). For instance, students are more likely to achieve at high levels if they are persistent, reasonably (but not overly) energetic, and able to ignore minor distractions. They can also achieve greater academic success if their behaviors lead to friendly, productive relationships with teachers and peers—people who can bolster their self-esteem and support their efforts to learn.

Yet there is no single “best” temperament that maximizes classroom achievement. Instead, children are more likely to succeed at school when their behaviors are a good fit, rather than a mismatch, with classroom expectations. For instance, highly energetic, outgoing children are apt to shine—but quieter students might feel anxious or intimidated—when teachers want students to participate actively in group discussions and projects. Quieter children do better—and some energetic children might be viewed as disruptive—when teachers require a lot of independent seatwork (Keogh, 2003).

As teachers we must recognize that, to a considerable degree, students’ ways of behaving in the classroom—their energy levels, their sociability, their impulse control, and so on—reflect temperamental differences that are not entirely within their control. If we keep this fact in mind, we are apt to be more tolerant of students’ behavioral idiosyncrasies and more willing to adapt our instruction and classroom management strategies to accommodate their individual behavioral styles (Keogh, 2003). The feature “Accommodating Students’ Diverse Temperaments” presents several examples of strategies we might use.

Parents’ Influences

Through the many things they do—and don’t do—each day, parents can have a significant impact on children’s personalities. Here we’ll focus on three aspects of parent–child relationships that seem to be especially influential: attachment, parenting styles, and child maltreatment.

Attachment  Many parents and other important family members (e.g., grandparents, older siblings) lovingly interact with a new infant and consistently and dependably provide for the infant’s physical and psychological needs. When they do such things, a strong, affectionate caregiver–child bond known as attachment typically forms (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978).

Infants who become closely attached to parents or other caregivers early in life are apt to develop into amiable, independent, self-confident children who adjust easily to the classroom environment, establish productive relationships with teachers and peers, and have an inner conscience that guides their behavior. In contrast, youngsters who do not become closely attached to a parent or some other individual early in life can be immature, dependent, unpopular, and prone to disruptive and aggressive behaviors later on (Hartup, 1989; Kochanska, Aksan, Knaack, & Rhines, 2004; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2005; S. Shulman, Elicker, & Sroufe, 1994; Sroufe, Carlson, & Shulman, 1993).

Attachment to a parent or other adult caregiver remains important even in adolescence. Most adolescents continue to see their relationships with parents and other family members as important and valuable throughout the secondary school grades (J. P. Allen, McElhaney, Kuperminc, & Jodl, 2004; R. M. Lerner, 2002; Nestemann & Hurrelmann, 1994). Although teenagers often disagree with their parents, those who are well-adjusted tend to do so within the context of an affectionate, supportive parent–child relationship (J. P. Allen et al., 2003).

Parenting Styles Researchers have discovered that many parents exhibit somewhat consistent patterns of behavior in rearing their children. Differing parenting styles are associated with different behaviors and personality traits in children (Baumrind, 1971, 1989, 1991; Maccoby & Martin, 1983).

The ideal situation for most children is authoritative parenting.   Parents using this style provide a loving and supportive home, hold high expectations and standards for performance, explain why behaviors are or are not acceptable, enforce household rules consistently, include children in decision making, and provide age-appropriate opportunities for independence. Children from authoritative homes are happy, energetic, confident, and self-reliant. They make friends easily, have good social skills, and show concern for others’ rights and needs. They are motivated to do well in school and, as a result, are often high achievers. Authoritative parenting provides a good model for how, as teachers, we should generally run our classrooms (J. M. T. Walker & Hoover-Dempsey, 2006).

It is important to note here that most research on parenting involves correlational studies that reveal associations between parents’ behaviors and children’s characteristics but do not necessarily demonstrate cause-and-effect relationships. A few experimental studies have documented that specific parenting styles probably do influence children’s personalities to some degree (W. A. Collins et al., 2000). In other cases, however, parents’ disciplinary strategies seem to be the result, rather than the cause, of how children behave. For instance, temperamentally lively or adventuresome children typically require more parental control than quieter, restrained ones (J. R. Harris, 1998; Jaffee et al., 2004; Stice & Barrera, 1995).

Children of authoritative parents appear well-adjusted, in part because their behaviors are considered ideal by many people in Western cultures: They listen respectfully to others, can follow rules by the time they reach school age, try to be independent, and strive for academic achievement. But authoritative parenting is not universally best; other parenting styles may be better suited to particular cultures. For example, children of very controlling (and so apparently authoritarian) Asian American parents often do quite well in school. In many Asian American families high demands for obedience are made within the context of a loving, supportive mother–child relationship. Furthermore, principles of Confucianism teach children that parents are always right and that obedience and emotional restraint are essential for family harmony (Chao, 1994, 2001; Lin & Fu, 1990).

Impoverished economic conditions, too, may require authoritarian parenting. In low-income, inner-city neighborhoods where danger may lurk around every corner, parents may better serve their children by being very strict and directive about activities (Hale-Benson, 1986; McLoyd, 1998). In addition, the stresses of impoverished financial resources can become so overwhelming that they limit parents’ ability to solicit children’s ideas about family rules (Bronfenbrenner, Alvarez, & Henderson, 1984). Communicating high standards for behavior and negotiating with children about seemingly unfair rules can take considerable time and energy—perhaps more time and energy than very stressful circumstances allow.

As teachers, we must take care not to point accusatory fingers or in other ways be judgmental about how parents are bringing up their children. Some parents may have learned ineffective parenting strategies from their own parents. Others may have challenges in their lives—perhaps mental illness, marital conflict, or serious financial problems—that hamper their ability to nurture and support their children. And of course, nonauthoritative styles may sometimes be culturally adaptive. Although we can certainly serve as valuable sources of information about effective disciplinary techniques, we must be careful that we don’t give total credit to or place total blame on parents for how they interact with their children.

In any event, parenting styles seem to have only a moderate (rather than a strong) influence on children’s personalities (W. A. Collins et al., 2000; Weiss & Schwarz, 1996). Many children thrive despite their parents’ less-than-optimal parenting styles, provided that their homes aren’t severely neglectful or abusive (J. R. Harris, 1995, 1998; Lykken, 1997; Scarr, 1992). Children with certain temperaments—for instance, those who tend to be adaptable, persistent, and outgoing—seem to be especially resilient in the face of difficult family circumstances (D. Hart, Atkins, & Fegley, 2003; Keogh, 2003).

Child Maltreatment In a few unfortunate instances, parents’ behaviors toward their children constitute child maltreatment. In some cases parents neglect children: They fail to provide nutritious meals, adequate clothing, and other basic necessities of life. In other cases parents (or possibly other family members) abuse children physically, sexually, or emotionally. Possible indicators of neglect or abuse are chronic hunger, lack of warm clothing in cold weather, untreated medical needs, frequent or serious physical injuries (e.g., bruises, burns, broken bones), and exceptional knowledge about sexual matters (Turnbull et al., 2007).

Parental neglect and abuse have significant adverse effects on children’s personal and social development. On average, children who have been routinely neglected or abused have low self-esteem, poorly developed social skills, and low school achievement. Many are angry, aggressive, and defiant. Others can be depressed, anxious, socially withdrawn, and possibly suicidal (Dodge, Pettit, Bates, & Valente, 1995; Maughan & Cicchetti, 2002; Nix et al., 1999; R. A. Thompson & Wyatt, 1999).

Teachers are both morally and legally obligated to report any cases of suspected child abuse and neglect to the proper authorities (e.g., the school principal or child protective services). Two helpful resources are the National Child Abuse Hotline at 1-800-4-A-CHILD (1-800-422-4453) and the Web site for Childhelp USA at

Common Parenting Styles

When Parents Exhibit This Parenting Style...Children tend to be...


  • Providing a loving, supportive home environment
  • Holding high expectations and standards for children’s behavior
  • Explaining why some behaviors are acceptable and others are not
  • Enforcing household rules consistently
  • Including children in family decision making
  • Gradually loosening restrictions as children become capable of greater responsibility and independence
  • Happy
  • Self-confident
  • Curious
  • Independent and self-reliant
  • Capable of considerable self-control
  • Likable, with effective social skills
  • Respectful of others' needs
  • Motivated and successful in school


  • Conveying less emotional warmth than authoritative parents
  • Holding high expectations and standards for children’s behavior
  • Establishing rules of behavior without regard for children’s needs
  • Expecting rules to be obeyed without question
  • Allowing little give-and-take in parent–child discussions
  • Unhappy
  • Anxious
  • Low in self-confidence
  • Lacking initiative
  • Dependent on others
  • Lacking in social skills and prosocial behaviors
  • Coercive in dealing with others
  • Defiant


  • Providing a loving, supportive home environment
  • Holding few expectations or standards for children’s behavior
  • Rarely punishing inappropriate behavior
  • Allowing children to make many of their own decisions (e.g., about eating, bedtime)
  •  Selfish
  • Unmotivated
  • Dependent on others
  • Demanding of attention
  • Disobedient
  • Impulsive


  • Providing little, if any, emotional support for children
  • Holding few expectations or standards for children’s behavior
  • Showing little interest in children’s lives
  • Seeming to be overwhelmed by self-focused personal problems
  • Disobedient
  • Demanding
  • Low in self-control
  • Difficulty handling frustration
  • Lacking long-term goals

Sources: Baumrind, 1971, 1989; W. A. Collins, Maccoby, Steinberg, Hetherington, & Bornstein, 2000; Dekovic & Janssens, 1992; Gonzalez & Wolters, 2005; Lamborn, Mounts, Steinberg, & Dornbusch, 1991; Maccoby & Martin, 1983; L. S. Miller, 1995; Paris, Morrison, & Miller, 2006; Rohner, 1998; Simons, Whitbeck, Conger, & Conger, 1991; L. Steinberg, 1993; L. Steinberg, Elmen, & Mounts, 1989; J. M. T. Walker & Hoover-Dempsey, 2006.

Cultural Expectations and Socialization

As we’ve seen, cultural groups can influence children’s personalities through the parenting styles they encourage. But culture also has a more direct influence on children’s personal and social development through a process known as socialization. That is, members of a cultural group work hard to help growing children adopt the behaviors and beliefs that the group holds dear. Children typically learn their earliest lessons about their culture’s standards and expectations for behavior from parents and other family members, who teach them personal hygiene, rudimentary manners (e.g., saying please and thank you), and so on. Once children reach school age, teachers become equally important socialization agents. For example, in mainstream Western society, teachers typically expect and encourage a variety of specific behaviors—showing respect for authority figures, following instructions, working independently, asking for help when it’s needed, controlling impulses, and so on (Helton & Oakland, 1977; R. D. Hess & Holloway, 1984). Cultures around the globe encourage many of these behaviors, but they don’t necessarily endorse all of them. As an example, let’s return to the opening case study. Recall how Lupita sits quietly in class, apparently even when she might need help with an assigned task. Many Mexican immigrants are more accustomed to observing events quietly and unobtrusively than to asking adults for explanations. Recall, too, that Lupita willingly abandons her own projects to play with one classmate and assist two others with puzzles. On average, children of Mexican heritage feel more comfortable working cooperatively with peers rather than independently.

Researchers have observed other cultural differences in personal and social characteristics as well. For instance, European American families often encourage assertiveness and independence, but families from many other countries (e.g., Mexico, China, Japan, India) encourage restraint, obedience, and deference to elders (Chao, 1994; Goodnow, 1992; Joshi & MacLean, 1994; Rothbaum, Weisz, Pott, Miyake, & Morelli, 2000). And whereas many children in China are reared to be shy, many in Zambia are reared to smile and be outgoing(X. Chen, Rubin, & Sun, 1992; Hale-Benson, 1986; D. Y. F. Ho, 1986, 1994). But considerable diversity exists within a culture, with different parents, teachers, and other adults encouraging somewhat different behaviors and beliefs.

When behaviors expected of students at school differ from those expected at home, or when belief systems presented by teachers are inconsistent with those of children’s parents, children may initially experience some culture shock. At a minimum, children are apt to be confused and less productive than they might be otherwise, at least in the first few days or weeks of school. Some youngsters with less adaptable or more irritable temperaments may even become angry or resistant (R. D. Hess & Holloway, 1984; Kumar, Gheen, & Kaplan, 2002).

As teachers, we must especially encourage our students to exhibit those behaviors essential for long-term school success, such as obeying school rules, following instructions, and working independently. For example, when we expect students to work independently, even those students who have not had this expectation placed on them at home show improved work habits (J. L. Epstein, 1983). At the same time, students will need our guidance, support, and patience when our expectations differ from those of their family or cultural group.

Excerpt from Educational Psychology Developing Learners, by J.E. Ormrod, 2008 edition, p. 64-69.

© ______ 2008, Merrill, an imprint of Pearson Education Inc. Used by permission.  All rights reserved. The reproduction, duplication, or distribution of this material by any means including but not limited to email and blogs is strictly prohibited without the explicit permission of the publisher.

Next Article: Observation Guidelines: Noticing Temperament in Infants and Toddlers

When children are born, what responsibilities does their birth bring to the life of their parents and to the society that surrounds them? How should their life condition and education be organized? What are their current and future needs? What skills will they develop in the course of their lives? How to educate them so that they are subjects of their own actions, aware of their position and place in the world?

The birth of every child represents a big challenge to all who are responsible for his or her care and education. Simultaneously, it represents the renewal of the hope of men and women, because a new opportunity to achieve full humanization of the individuals born with him or her as well, with the consolidation of practical, intellectual and artistic capacities (Zaporóshetz, 1987), and affection, all constituted in his or her integration into social life and expressed in his or her singular way of being, feeling and acting. How can school contribute to the development of a child's personality? What is the role of Early Childhood Education in the comprehensive formation of the little ones, addressed in academic and legal texts, but not always made concrete in educative practices at daycares and preschools (Brasil, 2009a, 2009b)? Our reflections are dedicated to these questions. We know, nonetheless, that, given their complexity, we are not able to go through all of them in one single article. We will seek, then, to present some principles we deem to be fundamental for the comprehension of the development of the personality of little children, based on assumptions of the Cultural-Historical Theory. We understand that the dialogue we have herein with the authors that help us to reflect about the theme from this perspective can expand in/to other spaces, leading teachers to be aware of how much - even though often little intentional - they interfere with the formation of a child's personality, and of how the understanding of this process can enhance (Davidov, 1988) their work with children. Thus, we see that the conceptual discussion about personality development and, especially, about the interference that the educative process has on it, is an important theme to the formation of teachers that work or will work at daycares and preschools.

We believe that, in addition to close attention to the children, deepening readings, studies and debates developed by teachers working at these spaces is a must, because, through their practice, specific programs of and for Early Childhood Education are established (Carvalho 2011; Brasil 2009a), which leads them to expand positively and qualify the way through which boys and girls relate to the world around them, to people, and, in this process, how they progressively build the understanding of themselves.

In this article, we invite the reader to think with us over the theoretical foundations that allow us to perceive how a pedagogical work influences the formation of specifically human capacities in every child we care for and educate. After all, whether we are aware of that or not, teaching interferes with a child's personality, making every boy or girl a unique and unrepeatable individual, and with the intellectual and practical forces that are essential to their present and future lives.


For the comprehension of the importance of education in the process of personality development, let us start by discussing what speaking of this concept means for the Cultural-Historical Theory.

We know that, based on the Dialectical and Historical Materialism, the movement and contradiction categories are essential to the explanation of phenomena. Vigotski3 and colleagues supported their entire theoretical construct on this philosophy. From this point-of-view, we understand that human development involves, in a continuous movement, two forces that while contradictory and independent from a common sense perspective, are essentially inter-related, for the Cultural-Historical Theory: social forces and biological forces. According to Vigotski (1931/2013a),

Both development realms - natural and cultural - coincide with and merge in one another. The changes that happen in both realms intercommunicate and constitute, in fact, a unique process of social and biological formation of a child's personality. As the organic development is produced in a cultural domain, it starts to be a biological process historically conditioned. At the same time, cultural development acquires a very peculiar character that cannot compare to any other type of development, since it is produced simultaneously and together with the organic maturation process, and because the one that has such character is the growing and maturing mutant body of the child. (p. 36).

To perceive the influence between biological and social factors, attributing to the cultural development the power of interfering with the formation of specifically human capacities, which Vigotski (1931/2013a) calls superior psychic functions, has direct implications on the way of seeing pedagogical work. Thus, we understand that, as teachers, we can do something about child development by organizing spaces and times, establishing relations, and proposing involving and enriching experiences for the cultural repertoire of children so that they can develop activities with culture objects and, thus, appropriate them (Carvalho, 2011; Duarte, 1993). As the activity becomes more complex, intellectual capacities and personality become more complex as well, since they are formed in and by the activity (Bissoli, 2005).

We ask herein: what does that mean? When children engage in tasks with a meaning, when they know the reason and purpose of their actions and make emotional moves toward achieving their goals, they are performing an activity and, for this reason, they develop their capacities fully, becoming gradually and progressively aware about the motives for their conduct (Leontiev, 2010). Thus, the concept of activity allows us to see the indissolubility between cognition and affection in the development of personality, which, according to Leontiev (1978, p.135) is "a new psychological formation being shaped in the midst of the individual's vital relations, as a product of the transformation of his or her activity." To the author, personality is a comprehensive formation whose systemic qualities are generated by social relations in which each individual takes on the role of subject of the activity. This is evident in his words: "... the real basis of a man's personality is not the set of his relations with the world, which are social by nature, but the relations that occur and that are established by his activities, more specifically by the set of his diverse activities" (Leontiev, 1978, p. 143).

In this sense, when an adult allows a child to participate in decisions about how to express what the latter has learned during a visit to the zoo, for instance - through the preparation of a panel, or a dramatization, or even a sheet containing curiosities about the animals seen there -, each task acquires a meaning and, due to the emotional involvement it allows for, it contributes to the development of different capacities of the child. In this regard, memory, attention, oral, written or plastic language, and self-control are some of the superior psychic functions that are strengthened, directly interfering with the development of personality.

It is important to highlight that personality is a complex formation of human psychism (Leontiev, 1978) that comprises cognitive capacities, emotions, will, character traits. Personality is a system constituted of distinct psychological functions that, when integrated, characterize the singular form that every individual acts in the world. It is a stable system. Thus, developed personality is characterized by certain univocal reactions to events (relative unity of behaviors, the individual's reaction to what happens around him or her) and by unit values. That means that it is not merely reactive to situations. People with a mature personality are aware of their possibilities, of the reasons for their conduct, and, above all, can actively dominate their behavior.

Nevertheless, Duarte (2013), based on studies by Vigostki, stresses that the development of the personality of individuals is conditioned by the development already achieved by the society of which they are part, since human psychism is historical and social. The author points out that the process through which the subject appropriates culture in an active manner is the propelling element for him or her to master capacities that are proper of the social dynamics, and to master conducts, attributing to the educative process a fundamental importance: the expansion of the cultural capital, effected in the school, sophisticates the forms of comprehension of subjects about society and themselves, allowing for the qualitative transformation of their consciousness and, with it, of their forms of acting, and of their personality.

If this is a complex process that extends throughout a long period in the ontogenesis, having it as an objective since early childhood is the way through which teachers can contribute to the enrichment of the children's experiences. According to Vigostki, experiences represent the unity between the elements of the cultural domain and the singularities of personality, and determine the way that every child relates to his or her surroundings in each moment of his or her development (Vigotski, 1935/2010; Mello, 2010). Proposing experiences that broaden the cultural references of children, by means of involving activities that take them as individuals means to construct a program that intentionally interferes with the development of different child psychic functions, of emotions and of personality (Carvalho, 2011).

Unlike other approaches, the Cultural-Historical Theory has as one of its assumptions that the development of personality is not natural, rather historical and social, that is, it depends on the integration of the individual, since the first moments of life, into society, which is full of demands, expectations and habits. For this reason, the regularities that characterize the formation of personality since childhood until adulthood are - as are so all spheres of a person's development from this very same perspective -, resulting from the interchange between the peculiarities of the child's psychophysiological development and of his or her cultural development (Vigotski, 1931/2013a). It is in social activity that personality is configured.

During childhood, the first levels of formation of an individual's personality are established. Leontiev (1978) states that this is the spontaneous period of the development of this system. It is in the first year of life that children learn values, conduct norms and specifically human capacities, and become capable of expressing themselves in a singular manner before the world: they build a more and more complex consciousness about objects and their knowledge of them, about human relations and, especially, about themselves (self-consciousness). This process is mediated by situations that children live, thus we can affirm that the personality of each one of them is a result of their biography: their life and education conditions, the activities they develop, the learning processes they undergo, and the development of their psychism, as pointed out by (1929/2000) and Sève (1979).

For this reason, the intentional and systematized educative process that takes place in the childhood school plays a fundamental role. As teachers, based on a permanent theoretical deepening that allows for the comprehension about a child and the construction of specific forms of teaching, we can and should mediate the formation of this integrative system that marks every child's singularity. Let us understand the pedagogical implications of this statement.


At birth, children are immediately inserted into social relations: all of their needs are met by an adult, who becomes the center of attention of the baby. Affection, attention and constant talk with children creates in them a need that is socially mediated: the need for new impressions (Bozhovich, 1981), that is, the need to see more, to hear more, to touch more and to be touched more. It is important to remember that, in babies, visual and hearing structures have not developed completely yet. The enrichment of visual and hearing impressions contributes to the organic evolution of the senses in a satisfactory manner. For this reason, the richer the experiences of a child with an adult - who becomes the mediator of the first sensorial contacts of the baby with the world around him or her -, the more positive this child's physical and emotional development will be in the first period of life.

The central psychological formation in the first year of life is perception. It enables the sensorial appropriation of the world in a direct communicative and emotional process with the adult. What does this mean? In this first period of the psychic development, the main activity - the one that promotes a greater development of the intellectual and practical capacities and of the personality of the child in this moment (Leontiev, 2010) - is the emotional communication the baby establishes with people around him or her (Elkonin, 1987). Because of that, although in the first months of life babies are not able to express themselves through conventional talk yet, they can communicate with the people around. For this reason, they use other languages, such as crying, smiling, movements of throwing their arms and body towards the adult and the objects they want, closing their hands as if they wanted to grab something they cannot reach, etc. It is important to observe that all of these behaviors of the baby have an affective nature, that is, they happen because people around him or her and objects presented to him or her provoke emotions, like the joy of reaching them or the pleasure of physical contact with the adult, creating a need for new impressions.

Thus, talking to children, showing them objects and people, holding them, touching them with kindness are all forms of communication affectively mediated that sophisticate perception and promote the functional development of the brain, through the enrichment of the impressions about the world and people, and of the possibility babies have to execute their first forms of generalization: the sensorial generalization. One only needs to remember the motor-sensorial unity that characterizes the first year of life. Perception happens as the baby operates with objects around, in constant interaction with the adult. It is worth remembering that it is this very same interaction the main motivator of the intellectual and affective development of the baby. Thus, by knowing to what extent a systematized and intentional educative work can impel the development of children since very early age, we can grasp how important it is, in Early Childhood Education, since day nursery, for children to be cared for and educated by teachers (Brasil, 2009a, 2009b).

The activity together with an adult generates a new need that is culturally mediated and originates a new moment in the child's psychic development: the moment of object manipulation (Elkonin, 1987), which extends throughout a period of one to three years of age, approximately.

During the manipulation of objects, memory becomes, at first, the function developed as a major line, subordinating the other psychic formations. Very little children now no longer subject themselves to stimuli present in their perceptive field. If a short time ago an adult could distract them, placing before them different objects attractive by themselves, now, with the evolution of memory, children already show their condition as subjects. They do not want the object anymore. They want a certain object they remember and that motivates their behavior. There is, for the first time, a clear evidence of their developing personality. Motivating representations are then defined (Bozhovich, 1987), which attest the presence of a new level of thinking: if once the baby thought only by means of actions, now he or she is also thinking through images. Thus, the more a teacher talk to babies about the objects they manipulate and recognize - which should be varied and attractive -, the more he or she will be contributing to increment their thoughts.

In this period, the perception of children become increasingly semantic, that is, they are already capable of comprehending the world around them in a more integrated manner. Very little children begin to perceive themselves as subjects of the actions they perform, and this is a central progress for the development of their personality. In this way, even if the adult remain as the central motivator of the child's behavior, the former, in this moment, takes a new position: of partner in the actions executed with social objects. Children manipulate them, appropriating their physical characteristics and, simultaneously, perceiving their own possibilities as subjects that perform actions with these objects. This is why it is so common that they repeat the same actions over and over again: opening and closing the door; throwing on and taking back an object from the floor; pushing and pulling... They are involved in a complex process of perception on things and of self-perception, mediated by the presence of an adult - first as a collaborator, then as a model of actions. It is important to consider that in this moment children impersonate the adult. Then, what Vigotski (1932/2013b) calls a "near play" happens (p. 359). If, apparently, the activity they perform is a make-believe one, children, actually, do not create a fictitious situation, which is proper of the role-playing game. They are not capable yet of representing a role symbolically. For this reason, a little girl cradles her doll, but still sees it as a doll, while for an older child involved in the make-believe, the doll would be, in an imaginary situation, the daughter, and she, the mother. We can say that children externally imitate the actions of the adult without putting themselves in his or her place.

Even before three years of age, the first form of self-consciousness is defined in children: the affective one. Although they do not know consciously they are somebody different from the adult, and even though they do not perceive themselves as people and have not developed their identity fully yet, children already have their own will, which often opposes the will of the adult, showing that their personality is about to go through a complete transformation.

During the period in which the main activity is the manipulation of objects, children develop a fundamental capacity, which will mark a new stage in their thinking processes: the oral language. It is when they seek to broaden their communicative possibilities by expanding their vocabulary deliberately. He or she wants to know the names of objects, as if the former were properties of the latter. The enrichment of oral language promotes new levels of generalization that start to mediate children's actions. It is interesting to observe that, even without mastering language structures in full, a child can communicate very well by creating expressions, words and phrases that allow others to comprehend him or her, although his or her thinking is radically different from the thinking of an adult. In this sense, adults and children share words, which help the little ones assimilate an increasingly rich vocabulary and a progressively less situational thinking, although the meanings of these very same words undergo an evolution process and have their own characteristics (Vygotski, 1934/2001).

Thus, oral language allows children to do generalizations that are more complex and to think of objects and relations that are not present in their perceptive field. This enrichment brings about the consolidation of a new form of thinking: the verbal thinking. Thereby, talking to children is a fundamental action. Paying attention to what they say and dialogue with them about facts and objects are attitudes that mobilize an increasingly comprehensive development of language and thinking.

Vigotski (1935/2010) helps us to think over a question that is essential to the comprehension of a child's personality development: at every moment of life, and according to the possibilities already achieved in their development, children are able to comprehend facts and situations around them and to relate to them, emotionally and cognitively, in a completely new way. Thus, the development of verbal thinking takes on a fundamental importance in personality formation. The author states that the oldest memories about our early childhood originate from the moment when language and thinking are no longer independent processes, constituting, now, one single process, mediated by the meanings of the words - which start to be the substrate of both the way how we think the world and the way how we express our comprehension of it (Vygotski, 1931/2013a).

In this sense, if once the little child had a comprehension of facts, of people and of relations that was limited to what was immediately seen and witnessed, without more complex relations being established, now, with verbal thinking, he or she can create new and more sophisticated relations, through words that represent objects, facts, people (Mello, 2010). This leads children to, little by little, get rid of the coercive effect objects had on them and to begin acting according to plans and motives expressed by means of the oral language, which represents the verbal form of thinking. They become capable of thinking, and being moved, and motivating their behavior by words, which represents an intense sophistication of their possibilities of relating to and comprehending the world where they live.

Around three years of age, a new moment starts in the development of a child's personality that will last until he or she is six years old, approximately: the moment of games and playful activities (Bissoli, 2005).

In this period, children go through a complete transformation in their personality, being marked by a new central formation: the discovery of themselves as subjects, the formation of their own identity, or, in the words of Bozhovich (1987, p. 261), of the "I system". If a short while ago, children did not think to be people independent of an adult, now this change happens. They begin to refer to themselves by the pronoun "I" and to attempt to mark their possibility of performing activities without the help of those who take care of them. They want to dress themselves, to bath themselves and to eat by themselves; they oppose the adult who might want to control their actions. The awareness of parents and teachers about the importance of this critical moment, which represents a turn in a child's development, is fundamental to prevent crises (Vygotski, 1932/2013b) that happen when there is a deep gap between what the children is already able to do and what is effectively allowed by the adult. In this context, if letting children solve everything by themselves is not a possibility, the adults can present options so that the former make choices. The important thing is that children take a new position in the relations, that they are no longer treated as babies, and that they exercise, as far as possible, their autonomy. Thus, if life and education conditions have had an impact on their condition as developing subjects who have a voice and a place in the world, this autonomy results from the children's previous experiences, in which they developed talking, walking, memory, perceptions in general and the perception on themselves. It is worth remembering that their relationship with their surroundings has changed proportionally to the development of their capacities. They are able to comprehend facts and themselves in an entirely new way, and, in these conditions, the adult plays the essential role of preventing crises, allowing children to take on new roles in relationships with people (Leontiev, 2010).

Role-play or make-believe games constitute the main activity in this moment of development (Elkonin, 1987,2009) started around three years of age. The child, who already used to imitate the actions of the adult since the previous period, now recognizes that such actions have a social role. The desire to perform the same activities adults do, and the inability of doing so, combined with the development achieved so far, condition the appearance of the make-believe game. How is his or her development in that moment? We can say that, with an adequate organization of the child's life and with the experiences lived in the first three years of life, the child will have formed or will be about to form: the semantic perception on the world, which allows him or her to comprehend reality in an integrated manner; developed memory; verbalized thinking; intellectualized language; increasingly concentrated attention that ceases his or her reactions to any and every stimulus present in his or her perceptive field; the possibility of performing actions with indirect objectives; symbolic representation, which enables the use of substitutive objects to represent real objects; consciousness, first affective and increasingly more rational of himself or herself as a person who, in addition to performing actions, also participates in relations as a "social me" (Bozhovich, 1987, p. 264); subordination of motives, which allows children to hierarchize their actions and to act according to such hierarchization; establishment of inner ethical instances (Vygotski, 1932/2013b), which allows children to differ desire from duty and, in the game, to act in accordance with the rules, appropriating social norms and values. With all this development, which is cognitive and affective, in an integrated manner, (Gomes, 2008), now, when playing, children imitate the social roles of adults they could observe in their real life experiences. They symbolically represent the activities performed by them, the adults, progressively developing their own forms of understanding the world, people and themselves.

It is important to highlight that role-playing does not develop spontaneously (Vigotski, 2007; Mukhina, 1996; Martins, 2006), it is also socially mediated: the themes of children's games are those present in their daily lives and that can be observed. Hence the importance of the adult in the enrichment of experiences of children. When adults read stories on a daily basis, when they encourage the observation of social roles around, when they enrich children's experiences with knowledge about the world and people, the possibility of playing make-believe become much broader and developmental.

On the other hand, something should be remembered: although they have an essential importance, role-playing games are not the only responsible for the development of all the important learnings of children in Early Childhood Education. Their engagement in other activities that develop their expressive capacity and their knowledge of the world, of people and of social objects has a fundamental role. Drawing, orality, movements that promote body awareness, painting, molding, math knowledge, music, writing and reading also have a great importance in the formation of intellectual, practical and artistic capacities and in the development of personality. Hence the need children have to be involved in diversified and meaningful activities that incite their curiosity and affect them positively and, in this sense, lead them to appropriate cultural objects, developing their superior psychic functions. In this context, the work of a teacher as a person who, when proposing situations that enable an increase in children's needs to know and to express diversify and enrich their activities, becomes essential to the development of children's personality (Zaporóshetz, 1987).

The moment of games and playful activities creates the bases for a new period in personality development: the education moment. By imitating the social roles of adults, children progressively realize they do not master the knowledge of the latter, which become so interesting to them. Adults (and older children) know many things little children want to learn. In our society, the privileged place for learning these pieces of knowledge is the school, and boys and girls know that since very early. They wish to occupy new spaces in social relations, a new development situation in which they no longer feel so distant from the adults, but are valued by them. New transformations in personality are yet to come: increasingly abstract ways of thinking and the formation of concepts that result from that; a greater argumentative capacity; a deeper and deeper self-consciousness about their own possibilities and will; the possibility of acting with objectives formulated in advance. All these new capacities and personality traits will make children's consciousness more complex in the moment of education (Bozhovich, 1981, 1987; Elkonin, 1987).

The role of teachers is vital in this process. These professionals have an indisputable function in the full development of children. Let us think it over.


As seen so far, education plays a preponderant role in the development of children. Educating is humanizing; it is, according to José Martí (1991, quoted by Mészáros, 2008), depositing in every man the entire human work that precedes him, making him effectively human.

We know that the educative activity does not happen in the school only; family and society also participate in this task actively. The school, though, is the place systematically organized for educating. Its social function is to promote, by means of pedagogical process, the learning of contents of the culture defined by humankind throughout History and, from it, to promote the development of capacities of children and their singular form of being and acting socially.

To do so, the pedagogical work that effectively promotes development is founded on a deep theoretical knowledge about human development. It is a teacher's responsibility to comprehend that culture, through different mediation forms, can be appropriated by children, contributing to their formation as complete people. It is also his or her role to select material and non-material objects of the cultural capital accumulated by society, and, knowing about the specificities of the moments of children personality development, to organize times, spaces, relations and formation experiences that allow for the effective appropriation of knowledge that goes beyond that already present in the daily living of children and that is assimilated even without the participation of the school's systematized work. The childhood school should be a space that makes a difference in the life of children: a space for intervention on formation capacities, a space for activities that allow children to comprehend and comprehend themselves, to perceive and perceive themselves, to learn, to enjoy (Brasil, 2009a, 2009b). The school should be a space for creation of new needs that impel children to learn and develop.

Thus, as children grow up and experience different situations - seeing, hearing, imitating and performing by themselves what they learn from people around them, participating in the life of their families, community and society -, new formations (Leontiev, 1978) are constructed in their brain, and new relations are established by them with their social surroundings. The childhood school has a fundamental role in the qualification of these processes by carrying out a pedagogical work marked by intentionality and systematized methods.

Acting pedagogically in order to intervene positively in the broad development of little children, provoking the development of personality, requires a knowledge of the main characteristics of each moment of child development and its formative dynamics. It demands, above all, acting not only on the capacities already formed, but, especially, on those capacities already in formation process in the child. In this way, teachers act, primarily, on the development zone close to the child (Vygostki, 1932/2013b), and thus their work impels the development of intellectual, affective, practical and artistic capacities of child personality.

Comprehending what being a mediator of learning and development means, herein, becomes fundamental. Etymologically, the word mediation derives from the Latin term mediation, meaning intercession, interposition, intervention. In this sense, mediating is positioning in between, it is acting deliberately to interfere with a process or situation. The interpretation of the term mediate, when it comes to the educative work of teachers, refers to the fact that they take on the task of promoting a meeting between two elements of the learning-teaching process: the child who learns and the cultural object learned by him or her. Thereby, this is not about putting children beside objects so that they, by themselves, discover, build knowledge - whether these objects are material, like books, building blocks, folding paper, scissors and glue, puzzles, paints and pencils, or non-material, like numbers, reading, writing, music and diversified forms of human expression. Every object carries, in addition to physical properties, pieces of knowledge accumulated about their use, historically formulated by humankind. Books are followed by manipulation and reading procedures culturally defined; games have set rules; movements have meanings consolidated throughout history, just as music, painting, sculpture, drawing, sciences. Mediating means, therefore, promoting a meeting between a child and the social use for which an object exists. Thus, it is not necessary that every child reinvent knowledge. The process through which they learn is an appropriation/objectification process of what exists. (Duarte, 1993). Learning means knowing how to use objects according to their social role, knowing about them and thinking about them in an increasingly autonomous manner. In this process, knowing himself or herself and knowing his or her own possibilities. In this sense, teachers perform a fundamental work: acting with children so that they perceive the uses of cultural objects and expand their understanding of human knowledge and productions; organizing situations for children, in interaction, to act toward interfering with the learning process of each other based on previous knowledge, aiming at the creation of new and more complex forms of comprehension that stem from relations with the culture historically accumulated in objects, in human knowledge and productions. The most important thing is that, through the mediation of an adult, the child is always in activity (Leontiev, 2010): that he or she is always motivated by the result of actions he or she performs and, in this way, is physically, intellectually and emotionally involved in what he or she performs.

Children are not passive in relation to the influences of teachers. Learning is an active process and implies the participation of the former as subjects, promoting their development. When listening to a story, when singing a song, when participating in a game or learning what an object is used for children live a singular experience that always involve learning and affection (Vigotski, 1935/2010).

In this sense, preschools and daycares are spaces for the establishment of relations between children and generic objectifications (arts, sciences, moral, politics and philosophy), given the specificities that mark learning and development in early childhood. These are spaces for mediation between daily living and their own knowledge (language, uses and habits) and unordinary and more complex possibilities of human action (Heller, 1977, 2008). The daycare and the school are spaces and times for learning and expressing; spaces and times for living every moment of development fully without anticipating them (Zaporóshetz, 1987) or awaiting them passively as if they were an autonomous, natural process; spaces and times for creation and expansion of humanizing needs capable of motivating the activities of children and, in this process, enabling the development of new forms of comprehension and action on objects, and of new relations with people; in short, spaces and times for personality development.

Human development is historical and social. Personality is historical and social. May the childhood school be the space for a meeting of children with historical and social conquests, with people and with themselves. May teachers be aware of the magnitude of their work in the formation of people, and be consciously and intentionally, the builder of a new humankind.

 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License


Bissoli, M. F. (2005). Educação e desenvolvimento da personalidade da criança: contribuições da Teoria Histórico-Cultural. Tese de Doutorado, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília, SP. [ Links ]

Bozhovich, L. I. (1981). La personalidad y su formación en la edad infantil: investigaciones psicológicas. La Habana, Cuba: Pueblo y Educación. [ Links ]

Bozhovich, L. I. (1987). Las etapas de formación de la personalidad en la ontogénesis. In V. Davidov, & M. Shuare, (Orgs.), La Psicología Evolutiva y Pedagógica en la URSS(pp. 250-273). Moscou: Editorial Progresso. [ Links ]

Brasil. (2009a). Práticas Cotidianas na Educação Infantil: Bases para a reflexão sobre as orientações curriculares. In: Projeto de Cooperação Técnica MEC e UFRGS para Construção de Orientações Curriculares para a Educação Infantil. Brasília: MEC. [ Links ]

Brasil. (2009b). Parecer CNE/CEB n. 20, de 11 de novembro de 2009. Revisão das Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para a Educação Infantil. Brasília: MEC. Recuperado em 2 de abril, 2013, de ndex.php?option= com_content&id=12745:ceb-2009. [ Links ]

Carvalho, R. N. S. (2011). A construção do currículo da e na creche: um olhar sobre o cotidiano. Dissertação de Mestrado, Faculdade de Educação, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus. [ Links ]

Davídov, V. (1988). La enseñanza escolar y el desarrollo psíquico. Moscou: Editorial Progresso. [ Links ]

Duarte, N. (1993). A individualidade para-si: contribuição a uma teoria histórico-social da formação do indivíduo. Campinas, SP: Autores Associados. [ Links ]

Duarte, N. (2013). Vigotski e a Pedagogia Histórico-crítica: a questão do desenvolvimento psíquico. Nuances: estudos sobre educação, 25(1), 19-29. [ Links ]

Elkonin, D. (1987). Sobre el problema de la periodización del desarrollo psíquico en la infancia. In: V. Davídov, & M. Shuare, (Orgs.), La Psicología Evolutiva y Pedagógica en la URSS (pp. 83-102). Moscou: Editorial Progresso. [ Links ]

Elkonin, D. (2009). Psicologia do jogo (2a. ed.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes. [ Links ]

Gomes, C. A. V. (2008). O afetivo para a Psicologia Histórico-Cultural: considerações sobre o papel da educação escolar. Tese de Doutorado, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília, SP. [ Links ]

Heller, A. (1977). Sociología de la vida cotidiana. Barcelona, Espanha: Ediciones Península. [ Links ]

Heller, A. (2008). O Cotidiano e a História (8a. ed.). São Paulo: Paz e Terra. [ Links ]

Leontiev, A. (2010). Uma contribuição à teoria do desenvolvimento da psique infantil. In: L. S. Vigotskii, A. R. Luria, & A. N. Leontiev. Linguagem, Desenvolvimento e Aprendizagem (12a. ed.) (pp.59-83). São Paulo: Ícone. [ Links ]

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Actividade, consciencia y personalidad. Buenos Aires: Ciencias Del Hombre. [ Links ]

Martins, L. M. (2006). brincadeira de papéis sociais e a formação da personalidade. In: A. Arce, & N. Duarte. (Orgs.). Brincadeira de papéis sociais na Educação Infantil:as contribuições de Vigostki, Leontiev e Elkonin (pp. 27-50). São Paulo: Xamã. [ Links ]

Mello, S. A. (2010). A questão do meio na pedologia e suas implicações pedagógicas. Psicologia USP, 21(4), 727-739. [ Links ]

Mészáros, I. (2008). A Educação para além do Capital (2a. ed.). São Paulo: Boitempo. [ Links ]

Mukhina, V. (1996). Psicologia da idade pré-escolar. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. [ Links ]

Sève, L. (1979). Marxismo e a Teoria da Personalidade. Lisboa: Horizonte Universitário. [ Links ]

Vigotski, L. S. (2000). Manuscrito de 1929. Educação e Sociedade, 21(71), 21- 44. (Original publicado em 1929). [ Links ]

Vigotski, L. S. (2007). A brincadeira e o seu papel no desenvolvimento psíquico da criança. Revista Virtual de Gestão de Iniciativas Sociais, 8(abr.), 23-36. [ Links ]

Vigotski, L. S. (2010). Quarta aula: o problema do meio na pedologia. Psicologia USP, 21(4), 681-701. (Original publicado em 1935). [ Links ]

Vygotski, L. S. (2001). Obras Escogidas II. Madrid: Visor. (Original publicado em 1934). [ Links ]

Vygotski, L. S. (2013a). Obras Escogidas III. Madrid: Visor. (Original publicado em 1931). [ Links ]

Vygotski, L. S. (2013b). Obras Escogidas IV. Madrid: Visor. (Original publicado em 1932). [ Links ]

Zaporóshetz, A. (1987). Importancia de los períodos iniciales de la vida em la formación de la personalidad infantil. In V. Davídov, & M. Shuare. (Orgs.), La Psicologia Evolutiva y Pedagógica em la URSS (pp. 228-248). Moscou: Editorial Progresso. [ Links ]

1Support: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

3Although the spelling of the Russian author's name is quite varied in the publications used herein, we have chosen to refer to him by the Portuguese-style form Vigotski, respecting, in the references, the forms adopted by the publishers.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *